Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Which was, as you've put it here and in other threads, "Fight them there so we don't have to fight them here."
Which makes sense, in a world where one brown person is pretty much exactly like every other brown person.
Problem is: The "them" we fought in Iraq was a different "them" than we needed to keep from attacking us again. They weren't even friends. Religious differences. No get alongy.
My neighbor punches me in the face, so in response, I burn down the K-Mart two towns over.
What part of this did you "understand"?
|
I acknowledge the point of view of those who disagree with our invasion of Iraq. I simply disagree. I do think the arguments against the war in Iraq has valid points. I believe we are going to be better served handling Iraq, terrorism and the ME now rather than in the future.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by roachboy
it's funny, the dominant response from the right about this book:
...
republicans sometimes make me laugh
|
I am waiting for specifics regarding "lies" about the war. I have not read or heard about any yet, have you?
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
Last edited by aceventura3; 05-29-2008 at 07:34 AM..
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|