|
I think acetylene kind of hit it here. SOMEONE thinks its porn, regardless of whether it was intended to be or not.
Personally, I think interpreting it as porn is absurd. I see these photos in the same light as I see an Anne Geddes calendar depicting naked babies. Yes, its entirely possible to have a naked body depicted with no sexual intention, but where that distinction is drawn is entirely one's own opinion.
Regardless, I'm sure the photographer is loving the uproar. Any publicity is good publicity in the art world.
__________________
Living in the United Socialist States of America.
|