Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - This was the old evolution thread, go to the new thread to post

bahb463 · 06-05-2003, 03:56 PM

Along the same lines.

It is obvious that people can not live on Antarctica. There is not enough food, nor shelter from the extreme elements. So, people don't live there. Were it not for religion, PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE STARVING IN AFRICA. Since those regions in Africa do not produce enough food, the people dumb enough to stay there, die, and have no childrens. Religion, in the form of missionaries, bring them food. Which teaches them nothing about the oldest law on earth besides gravity. Natural Selection. If you can't servive in a place, you move or DIE.
I realize it's a streach but it's a case of Religion trying to thwart Evolution. (and failing I might add)

Charity vs Evolution?
Which is best for the future of earth/mankind?

06-05-2003, 03:56 PM	#115 (permalink)
bahb463 Upright Location: Midwest USA	Along the same lines. It is obvious that people can not live on Antarctica. There is not enough food, nor shelter from the extreme elements. So, people don't live there. Were it not for religion, PEOPLE WOULD NOT BE STARVING IN AFRICA. Since those regions in Africa do not produce enough food, the people dumb enough to stay there, die, and have no childrens. Religion, in the form of missionaries, bring them food. Which teaches them nothing about the oldest law on earth besides gravity. Natural Selection. If you can't servive in a place, you move or DIE. I realize it's a streach but it's a case of Religion trying to thwart Evolution. (and failing I might add) Charity vs Evolution? Which is best for the future of earth/mankind? __________________ "...... and when I'm feelin' blue, The guitar's commin' through to sooth me." Last edited by bahb463; 06-05-2003 at 03:59 PM..