|
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Willravel
Cynth, you're still completely wrong on this, no matter which thread you try to jack it with.
I've changed, most other haven't. Instead of being happy with the hp available in my car, I've improved the hp/mpg ratio considerably. Can you imagine what would happen if everyone in the US did this? The Ford Mustang GT gets about 17/25 mpg with 300 hp. Imagine getting more horsepower and getting 29/32 mpg. It's about being more green by making your car more efficient. My car is more efficient.
What have you done to make your car more efficient, Cynth?
/threadjack
|
Yes, I drive it less. It's 100% stock, 2001 Plymouth Neon with 36,000 miles on it. I have averaged 5,142 miles per year on the vehicle.
So why isn't this 95 Eclipse electric? Something you're suggesting that Psycho Dad do...
But what Psycho Dad is stating is that he needed more towing power and the ability to haul cargo and people. This is something that larger SUVs were designed and used for. He found something that fits his needs, and your suggesting that he put more money into something that may not exactly fit his needs. It "may" fit based on your "torquey" comment, but that's not the same as knowing what hauling capabilty he has to do what he requires.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|