Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Is Supporting Obama's Candidacy More Important to You Than Beating McCain in November

host · 05-23-2008, 11:51 PM

People.... do you want to see me beg you? The fact that you won't even consider that there is some merit to what I am trying to tell you, is a disturbing sign, IMO, that you are not strategizing, and that there is some possibilty that beating McCain in november is not your highest priority.

IT HAS TO BE !

Latest from <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/138456">Newsweek</a> .

Clinton (48%) vs. McCain (44%)
Obama (46%) vs. McCain (46%)

Observe how Clinton refuses to concede, even with so many in her own party steadfastly opposed to her continued candidacy.

I am steeling myself for (in a campaign climate where the party in contol of the executive branch is known to be "hard at" data mining and analysis of intimate personal communications, transactions, and other personal details of all US residents....and thus privvy to the political leverage that kind of information guarantees...) the remorse and head shaking that I fear is coming in November, with the acceptance of the results as, we've come so far, as a country, but couldn't make it quite far enough, in the span of one election cycle, for sentiment to change enough to put Obama in the white house, but he came so close, and "next time"......

In my mind's eye, the script for this is already written, and it's because Obama has two strikes against him, both enabled by your denial..... racial attitude still pervasive in the US, and the advantage of superior and illegal intelligence gathering and analysis available to the party in power, heavily exploited for partisan political purposes, probably at least since mid 2001.....

The former would not interfere in a Clinton campaign against McCain, and the latter stands a better chance of being exposed by the Clinton campaign, if it was effective enough on it's own to bring victory for McCain, because it could not be masked with,

"the remorse and head shaking that I fear is coming in November, with the acceptance of the results as, we've come so far, as a country, but couldn't make it quite far enough, in the span of one election cycle, for sentiment to change enough to put Obama in the white house, but he came so close, and "next time"......"

I have to ask you, again....
"Is Supporting Obama's Candidacy More Important to You Than Beating McCain in November ?"

05-23-2008, 11:51 PM	#27 (permalink)
host Banned	People.... do you want to see me beg you? The fact that you won't even consider that there is some merit to what I am trying to tell you, is a disturbing sign, IMO, that you are not strategizing, and that there is some possibilty that beating McCain in november is not your highest priority. IT HAS TO BE ! Latest from <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/138456">Newsweek</a> . Clinton (48%) vs. McCain (44%) Obama (46%) vs. McCain (46%) Observe how Clinton refuses to concede, even with so many in her own party steadfastly opposed to her continued candidacy. I am steeling myself for (in a campaign climate where the party in contol of the executive branch is known to be "hard at" data mining and analysis of intimate personal communications, transactions, and other personal details of all US residents....and thus privvy to the political leverage that kind of information guarantees...) the remorse and head shaking that I fear is coming in November, with the acceptance of the results as, we've come so far, as a country, but couldn't make it quite far enough, in the span of one election cycle, for sentiment to change enough to put Obama in the white house, but he came so close, and "next time"...... In my mind's eye, the script for this is already written, and it's because Obama has two strikes against him, both enabled by your denial..... racial attitude still pervasive in the US, and the advantage of superior and illegal intelligence gathering and analysis available to the party in power, heavily exploited for partisan political purposes, probably at least since mid 2001..... The former would not interfere in a Clinton campaign against McCain, and the latter stands a better chance of being exposed by the Clinton campaign, if it was effective enough on it's own to bring victory for McCain, because it could not be masked with, "the remorse and head shaking that I fear is coming in November, with the acceptance of the results as, we've come so far, as a country, but couldn't make it quite far enough, in the span of one election cycle, for sentiment to change enough to put Obama in the white house, but he came so close, and "next time"......" I have to ask you, again.... "Is Supporting Obama's Candidacy More Important to You Than Beating McCain in November ?" Last edited by host; 05-24-2008 at 12:09 AM..