Originally Posted by Martian

The flaw in the Epicurus argument is that it assumes that a higher power thinks of right and wrong in the same way we do. I understand that this is supported (created man in His own image and all that), but the problem is that if God truly is omniscient than he has access to knowledge that we never will. This is why the 'we aren't meant to understand' argument does have merit; it's a gentler way of saying 'we are ignorant peons.'