Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
DJ, there's no way Obamists (myself included in that group, now) will vote for McCain. Even with maximum spite. If McCain wins, it will be because Hillary gave up running like a Democrat months ago and Obama was cheated.
Barr gives me pause. If Paul switched to Libertarian (WHERE HE SHOULD HAVE ALWAYS BEEN), he'd die off, but Paul maintaining he's a Republican means that Barr stands a chance of doing what Badnarik couldn't: attracting pissed off Republicans.
|
Why should Ron have always been Libertarian?
Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
Of course.
Paul won't do that. He's too stuborn. He'll run until the very end. And you're right in thinking it doesn't make sense. But that's his game.
|
I don't get what you're saying. Paul is running for the Republican nomination. Barr will be running for President in the general election. This means they aren't even competing against each other. Unless you're implying Ron is going to run third party or independent, which doesn't seem like the case at this point.
I don't think a Barr endorsement would be totally out of the question from Paul.