Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
so we actually can determine that there can be crimes that don't warrant DNA?
|
I freely admit my ignorance in the terminology of the law, but I thought there were crimes not classified as felonies.
Quote:
|
because nannystaters generally do?
|
You have a point. I would consider the extremes if it served my purpose. Damn. However, I don't think these extremes apply as it is about making justice work faster.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
it's been my experience that those intent on harming someone don't really care about the consequences anymore, DNA or not.
|
So because you see no benefit towards the prevention of crime, there is no point in this policy. Like you pointed out, laws don't stop crime. Enforcers stop crime, or enforcers punish those that that have committed crimes. The object of the this act is to expedite the administration of justice.
Originally Posted by JinnKai
My point, but I will look into the threads that talk about driver's licenses.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JinnKai
No, but it's one good way to filter the wheat from the chaff. It's not a perfect solution, but it does serve a valid purpose. If you were a 'safe' driver, maybe you wouldn't have had your license suspended in the first place?
|
Agreed. Had my license revoked... was my own damned fault.