Quote:
|
Crimes commonly considered to be felonies include, but are not limited to: aggravated assault and/or battery, arson, burglary, illegal drug abuse/sales, embezzlement, grand theft, treason, espionage, racketeering, robbery, murder, rape, kidnapping and fraud.
|
I see no problem requiring that individuals committed of these crimes should be required to provide their DNA on a successful conviction. These aren't 'accidental' things. Perhaps you're able to derive exceptional felonies like "habitual offender" felonies, but I believe that they, through their repeated disregard for the safety of others, are any different than those above.
Quote:
|
and, in my opinion, your FAILURE to understand that licensing requirements in no way, shape, or form guarantee a 'safe' drive demonstrates your inability to understand reality, or that a laminated government certificate does not make one a 'safe' driver. It's exemplary of everything that shows ones ignorance the real world and people.
|
No, but it's one good way to filter the wheat from the chaff. It's not a perfect solution, but it does serve a valid purpose. If you were a 'safe' driver, maybe you wouldn't have had your license suspended in the first place?