Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Augi
But there were also instances where it was valid to perform a terry stop. Your point? It isn't like you are required to give your DNA for nothing. You have been found to have done something very wrong in the eyes of the law.
|
so we actually can determine that there can be crimes that don't warrant DNA?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Augi
I see this as the adult version of name calling. Why do you instantly propose that we are in favor of the extreme far case?
|
because nannystaters generally do?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Augi
Freedoms come with a price. If with weren't for the consequences, what keeps you safe from anyone that has any free idea in their head?
|
it's been my experience that those intent on harming someone don't really care about the consequences anymore, DNA or not.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JinnKai
The license is for us to ensure you are safe to drive. I don't care that you feel you are safe.
|
a discussion we've had before about how having a license doesn't make one safe. continue to ignore it, i see it doesn't work for you.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JinnKai
I don't even think I need to respond to this one. Most CIVIL individuals, whether conservative or liberal, Democrat, Republican or Independent, man or woman, agree that licensing requirements for the operation of a motor vehicle are A VERY GOOD THING, considering the number of fatalities caused by MV accidents far exceeds those caused by any other violent crime. Your failure to understand this demonstrates you inability to understand the concept of a "greater good", and, in my opinion, demonstrates everything that exemplifies immaturity.
|
and, in my opinion, your FAILURE to understand that licensing requirements in no way, shape, or form guarantee a 'safe' drive demonstrates your inability to understand reality, or that a laminated government certificate does not make one a 'safe' driver. It's exemplary of everything that shows ones ignorance the real world and people.