View Single Post
Old 05-12-2008, 11:42 AM   #25 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i am bewildered about your apparent assumption that political officials have the expertise adquate to allow them to blow off review processes, ignore their own experts, etc, in the formulation of policy.

i am bewildered by your mode of argumentation, which seems only about superficial factoids buttressed by a faith in corporate actors operating within very specific types of bounded rationalities to be able to step outside that rationality and fashion policy that is somehow not predictated on corporate interest to the exclusion of all others.

i am bewildered by your apparent hostility to environmenal groups, which in the main function to raise political concerns that have to do with what is excluded from corporate internal thinking and imaging of their own performance and the impacts these exclusions have on stakeholders. in this, i am not making any argument that one side is entirely right and one entirely wrong--i just don't get the basis for your dismissal of environmental groups a priori.

i don't really understand anything about where you are coming from politically--you seem unconcerned with democratic process altogether, animated by some quaint faith in the ability of corporate entities to transcend their organizational limitations and act in the best interest of--well who?--themselves, really.

when you are not bothered by the way in which bush/cheney formulated their energy policy and someone reading your posts ask themselves "why is this?" the conclusion is that you don't care about procedural transparency. when you say "i don' care about process, i care about results" it simply reinforces this. it doesn't matter whether you said it or not--the logic is in place throughout what you did say,

the end justifies the means, a disregard for process, a contempt for democratic procedures--all these are typically stalinist. again, it is of no consequence to me whether you like it or not.

and you conflate political ideology with a consumer choice. that one i have so little nice to say about that i'm not going to waste the energy to go beyond this period.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360