Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
What "it" are you referring to? I think this is exactly my point.
|
It = a government (aided by the networks) misleading the American people by promoting the false impression that they are listening to the views of objective military analysts when in fact these individuals have been asked by the DoD (and the analysts agreeing -without disclosing that agreement) to simply regurgitate DoD talking points (and that they also have financial ties to defense contractors that they failed to mention).
Why is that so hard to understand?
Quote:
You're so deep in to the ideology supporting your argument, that you can't recognize "it".
|
I could just as well say that you are so deep in denial that you cant recognize it.
So I guess its a stalemate