otto....start with the many "scientists" that Ustwo has linked to in the past at junkscience.com or
Steven Milloy, the "scientist" who administers that site.....or from scientists cited by
Mark Morano, the chief denier on the minority staff of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
Or most (not all) of the speakers at the
recent deniers conference.....sponsored by the Heartland Institute and Competitive Enterprise Institute - two of the many organizations receiving major f
unding from Exxon/Mobil.
I dont doubt that there are serious climatologists that dont share the views of the majority.....in fact, there is a small minority of dissenting views within the IPCC community. I think thats a good thing.
But, the ones that are often linked or posted in discussions here generally are from the Morano/Milloy/Exxon crowd and IMO, and with a little digging, casts serious doubts on their credibility and objectivity.
as opposed to these
scientific bodies:
National Academies of Sciences of G8 (+5) Nations
Network of African Science Academies
International Council for Science
European Science Foundation
American Academy for Advancement of Science
Federation of American Scientists
World Meteorological Organization
American Meteorological Association
Royal Meteorological Society (UK)
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Physics
Federal Climate Change Science Program (US)
Geological Society of America
European Geosciences Union
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
International Union of Geological Sciences
With the July 2007 release of a revised statement by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
no remaining scientific body of national or international standing is known to reject the basic findings of human influence on recent climate