ustwo--i know we don't agree on much of anything, and i am sure that it will come as no surprise that the mister science voice you sometimes adopt just strikes me as odd. but if you have time, could you please find a source that you find makes a case parallel to yours that you take to be legitimate and maybe link to it and explain why you find it compelling? i just want to understand what exactly you are pointing to that you find compelling in this regard...i'm not going to go after the source, i'll be nice promise--but i'd really like to see how an argument that you find persuasive about climate change/global warming would operate. like a real one please.
i'm curious about how the arguments work.
and i'm really curious about the degree of separation between argument, data and politics.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|