View Single Post
Old 05-06-2008, 12:58 AM   #40 (permalink)
host
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
What effect on the world oil market would follow an announcement that the U.S. has started oil production in ANWR (Alaska)? Could this be used as the "nuclear option" if OPEC, international oil producers, and speculators continue to artificially drive up crude prices? I believe this kind of measure would quickly get their attention.
ottopilot, it's difficult for me to understand your questions.... ANWR is an insignificant project of, at best, long way off insignificant impact, given what it will add to the daily total world oil production "some day", and given chronic US consumption of 25 percent of all world daily production. Why would the current crude price be influenced by the "some day" event of ANWR adding...what.... a wildly optimistic 2 million bbls per day to an 85 million bbls per day total world output? Where do you think the rest of US domestic oil production numbers will be, along with the output numbers of the UK, considering it's recent dramatic decline, and likewise, Mexico's, and the recent fifth largest crude oil exporter, Norway be at, if and when ANWR delivers at it's highest potential? How much will US and rest of the world demand have grown when ANWR demonstrates it's first million bbls per day?

Will this hoped for "influence" of ANWR, not be checked by "stuff" like:
Quote:
http://uk.reuters.com/article/oilRpt...39687720080413
RIYADH, April 13 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah said he had ordered some new oil discoveries left untapped to preserve oil wealth in the world's top exporter for future generations, the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA) reported.

"I keep no secret from you that when there were some new finds, I told them, 'no, leave it in the ground, with grace from god, our children need it'," King Abdullah said in remarks made late on Saturday, SPA said.

The U.S. President George W. Bush in January urged the Saudi king to help tame soaring prices by encouraging OPEC to pump more oil. On separate trips to Saudi Arabia this year, the U.S. energy secretary also asked for more oil, while the vice president discussed high prices with the king.....
Does our government launch an incessant propaganda campaign intent on demonizing the Saudi king and his country as a prelude to bombing the shit out of them and invading them to provoke "regime change", while we cling to fantasies about "ANWR" as a solution to maintaining "our way of life", or do we examine our own close minded wastefulness and inefficiency in our energy use, along with the manipulation achieved through "free markets" advocacy:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...23&postcount=2 ?

and:
Quote:
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstra...A90994DB484D81
Arco Solar, Solarex Corp (NAICS: 333414, 333611 ) , SOLAREX CORP, STANDARD OIL CO (INDIANA)
Lueck, Thomas J.

New York Times. (Late Edition (East Coast)). New York, N.Y.: Oct 16, 1983. pg. A.18
New York Times Company Oct 16, 1983

The Sun, long a source of power in mythology, may soon be an actual source of household electricity - at least in bright places like America's Sun Belt. But some of the people working to develop the cells that generate electricity from sunlight are concerned that the oil business is controlling more and more of the solar industry.

This trend was highlighted last month when the Standard Oil Company of Indiana purchased Solarex, a Rockville, Md., company that last year ranked as the second largest United States manufacturer of photovoltaic cells. Arco Solar, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Atlantic Richfield Company, was the largest. Ranking third was the Solar Power Corporation, owned by Exxon.

<h5>''Virtually all of the photovoltaics industry is owned by Big Oil,"</h5> said Scott Sklar, political director for the Solar Lobby, an organization that advocates expanding development of solar technology. ''And the problem with that is these huge corporations don't have the kind of commitment you find in small innovative companies.'' Some consumer groups profess even greater worries about the oil industry's motives. ''The major oils see solar power as a competing source of energy, and they want to control it and slow it down,'' said Edwin Rothchild, a spokesman for the Citizen Energy Labor Coalition, another lobbying organization. But many experts in alternative energy research maintain that, if not for large investments by the oil companies, photovoltaic development would be grinding to a halt. ''If the oil companies are a menace, they are the most benevolent menace you could find, because nobody else seems willing to spend a dime,'' said Mitchell Diamond, an energy analyst for Booz Allen and Hamilton, Inc., a consulting firm.

Solarex, which was formed in 1973, lost $10 million in 1982. John Corsi, its president, said the company had been aggressively but unsuccessfully seeking a fresh infusion of cash from outside sources since March. He added that a merger with Amoco, which already held 35 percent of Solarex's stock, became the only alternative. Amoco, which paid $20 a share for a piece of Solarex in 1982, acquired the 65 percent of the company's shares it did not already own last month for only $2.50 a share, or a total of $12.2 million.....

Your "speculators" reference is...what???...when it is compared to the doubling of the value of the Euro vs. the US dollar in just the last 6 years. Do you really believe that "speculators" are raising the price of crude oil and indefinitely keeping it at high levels? How come the price of crude is lower, in terms of purchases of it with gold or with Euros, compared to a few years ago? Wouldn't it make more sense to accuse "speculators" of driving the valuation of the dollar down, than driving and holding crude prices higher, since the Euro and gold have been exempted from effects of these speculators manipulation?


Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU2003
I think we should fund the war in Iraq with a tax at the pump. We need to have a balanced budget, and it would get people to sacrifice in war time and stop funding OPEC (yeah, China & India would just buy cheap gas, but they wouldn't have the money if we didn't send tons of jobs there in the 90s)
When the current fiscal year ends on this coming Sept. 30, the increase in the national debt will be at least $700 billion since last October 1st. There were 136 million federal income tax returns filed for the tax year ending in 2006. Add 14 million additional tax payers who did not file or were not required to file, and you have a figure of 150 million tax filings. $700 billion is an average $4666 per filing.

If each tax filing represents an average, because of driving aged dependents and jointly filed tax returns....of say.... 900 US gallons of annual aggregate gasoline purchases (900 gals. X 20 MPG = 18,000 miles, instead of the average individual vehicle total miles driven of 12,000 miles....) at most, the impact of increased gasoline prices per tax filing would be $2.00 per gallon multiplied by 900 gallons purchased.... $1800. Gasoline will not average as much as a $2.00 per gallon increase for all of 2008 vs. in 2007, and average fuel economy is probably greater than 20 MPG for the US privately owned passenger vehicle fleet.

Oil is still mostly priced in and sold for dollars on world markets and the Euro buys twice as many dollars as it did in 2002. If oil sells for twice as many dollars as it sold for in 2002, oil has not increased in price at all, in terms of the Euro, and it actually requires less gold in exchange for any measure of oil as was required to exchange the same amount of oil for gold in 2002.

Why has the dollar fallen to just half the valuation it was bid up to in 2002, vs. the Euro?

Dramatically higher US federal deficits viewed in the rest of the world as unsustainable, mitigated by huge increases in military and intelligence gathering/analysis expenses.

Dramatically higher US trade deficits aggravated by the increased costs of importing 14 million bbls of petroleum and petroleum equivalents, on average, each and every day....growing debt viewed as unsustainable in the rest of the world.

Dramatically lowered interest rates vs. the rate policy of the European central bank....the Federal reserve lowered a key short term interest rate from 5-1/4 to just 2 percent in just the past 8 months, a rate drop of more than 60 percent. Just as oil is priced, world currencies are priced via auction bid futures contracts. Selling dollars and buying Euros results in earning much higher rates of return on low risk bank deposits of Euros in European banks than can be achieved by dollar deposits in US banks.

US government military, foreign, and financial policy has done no better than a cat chasing it's own tail for the last few years. The next presidential administration is already set up to fail because of this seemingly insurmountable and increasingly deteriorating dollar valuation decline.

The US must change perceptions by rapidly and dramatically decreasing it's government spending deficits and trade deficits, raise interest rates, import much less, export much more, and appear to be less burdened by war operational and military expenses.

A great way to begin the task without crippling tourism would be with innovative but seemingly extreme emergency regulations. I propose a ban on all automobile travel of less than 50 miles distance from home, exempted only when passenger vehicles contain two adults who are not relatives or residents in the same household. You are required to take an effing neighbor or some guy who lives four houses down from you for the past ten years who you've, up until now, only waved to when you've driven by as he mowed his front lawn. The restriction would help to make childless folks who live alone feel that they were receiving equal consideration.

Going to the grocery store or out for a restaurant meal....commuting to work...? Not in your car, you aren't....unless you share the trip and half of the gasoline formerly consumed in close to home car trips, which means most trips.

Require that deliveries of consumer goods by wholesale to retail of non-perishable items (Budweiser....Coca-cola...), or longer duration perishable's (Thomas's English muffins.... Frito-Lays chips...) be cut in half... twice per week instead of daily. Retailers can either find ways to accept and store larger but fewer deliveries, or experience out of stock periods, on occasion.

Our currency is sinking, and it is the key to sustaining our recent increased militarism and internal social order. Significantly cut petroleum consumption lowers world demand and US imports, lowering the US trade deficit and prices paid at the pump, increasing perception that a reversal of dollar decline pressures is possible, strengthening the dollar more than the actual influence of a declining trade deficit number.

A law requiring you to travel everywhere you go locally with a non-related person of at least driving age, of your own chosing, is kind of a small price to pay to instill both an awareness of a crisis and a feeling that there is some way to personally have a favorable impact on the problem. More so if half the time you are the non-paying passenger on the local trip!

I'm ending two weeks spent on the west coast, today. On my first trip out here in 1972, it seemed that every other vehicle was a VW sedan or a VW micro bus. The remnants of that now nearly 40 years old fleet is still visible; I've seen more old beetles and buses than I've seen anywhere else in a long time. I saw a '59 VW running down the Coast highway north of Santa Monica yesterday. I knew it was a '59 because my father bought a new '60 model in October of '59. The improvements were a larger rear window in the '60 model and a lowered back bumper that was not mounted high enought to obscure the tail lights. I hadn't seen a VW with that small rear window and high mounted rear bumper in a long time.....

My point is that the 30 MPG VW, so popular on the west coast and in the rest of the country in the 60's and 70's has a successor now, if you know to look for it. Every tenth car I've seen out here is a Toyota Prius gasoline/electirc Hybrid. I rented one myself since last friday, and I've averaged nearly 50 MPG. This car gets better fuel mileage in city driving than on the open road because it is propelled by the energy generated from braking the vehicle, converted to electricity stored in it's battery, when moving in stop and go traffic. The Prius is allowed to travel in California HOV lanes without multiple occupants because of it's low polluting and fuel consuming performance.

The problem is that, while my father's October 1959 purchase of a new 1960 VW beetle cost $1600, out the door, the 2008 Toyota Prius costs a minimum of $23,000 with tax and licensing fees. There will be no money saved by purchasing the Prius, because aside from it's hybrid design, it is not constructed or outfitted with the features of the average conventional sedan costing that amount. A Prius owner who travels 12,000 miles per year would have purchased 400 gallons of gasoline if he drove a new $17,000 sedan achieving 30 MPG, with the same non-hybrid features offered in the Prius. At $4.00 per gallon, the $17,000 sedan consumes $1,600 worth of fuel to travel 12,000 miles. The Prius, averaging 50 MPG, consumes 160 gallons less gasoline to travel 12,000 miles. The savings is 160 gallons X $4.00.... $640...but the Prius cost $6,000 extra to purchase, compared to the similarly equipped 30 MPG sedan.

I'm hoping that presenting "the math" in this post will help reach a few readers . I don't think technology will be cheap enough, quick enough, to justify a change that results in every tenth car, nationwide, being a Toyota Prius. I also have the experience of dropping off a couple of Mexican friends at their homes on a regular basis after work. The lots at their apartment complexes are jammed full with the gas guzzling, recent model SUV's and pickups traded in by the new Prius owners. I saw the same phenomena in lower income neighborhoods in the late 70's and early 80's. Streets filled with parked late model Buick, Chevy, and Cadillac cars. People of limited means always choose reliability and perceived value above fuel economy when the market is flooded with the gas guzzling cast offs of the well to do....

We in the US are living in a crisis period, but it isn't a fuel crisis, it is a currency valuation fundamentals crisis, aggravated by a huge dose of denial. The denial is featured in some of the posts in this thread, and is the reason why so many think it is "normal" for a post industrial economy country with just 6 percent of the world's population, to consume 25 percent of all petroleum sold each and every day across the world. It isn't "normal".

Last edited by host; 05-06-2008 at 01:45 AM..
host is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360