Cynthetiq

I am undecided. I don't see any compelling evidence you've presented on your website to push me in the direction of it.

ratbastid got close to showing that it's compelling, but again, I don't see it being a slam dunk in the same way that you do.

I am not opposed to it, nor am I for it. You've made the posit, and I'm looking for compelling evidence to change it from the current standard.

In a strictly numbers game, statisitical samples aren't too far off the mark. Yes, there is a margin for error which is dually noted, but for the most part statistical sampling is an acceptable method of finding a balance.

So far, you're biggest compelling and most cited arguments are where you representative of TTO feel it should be with a few citations to back up the historical perspective, but little to nothing to back up the current ideological changes you are touting.

In the 4 years your site has been around it hasn't seen any outside contributors of grad students, political pundits, something, anything, anyone else but your own constructs?

__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.