|
Seaver, again an attempt is made to make this discussion about me. Are the examples in the OP "moderate"? Do you see the difference between how the OP is laid out and how your post is constructed? Early in the OP, I quoted the posts of two other members. Then I supported my opinion that Lieberman is not a moderate....offering the evidence of his own words and his alliances and forwign policy priorities. Compare how I did that to what you posted. I invite you to take another stab at it...maybe beginning with, "host, lieberman does not seem extreme to me because he.....INSERT YOUR FACTS HERE...but you, host, seem extreme in your opinions because you....INSERT FACTS HERE..." Then it could follow Seaver, that your opinion could either stand on it's supporting merits, or....as I think Brian Williams' opinion did in the example of his defense of presenting the opinions on NBC news without qualification, fail on the weight of the evidence contrary to Williams' assertions that the two generals had no underlying agenda when they broadcast their take on matters related to the Iraq war. Why can't it work like that in our exchanges on this forum?
|