Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
Um, 100,000 people each would be ~3,000, not 300. You're right, though, a 5,000 member House would be insane.
I'd be ok with 500,000 each though, bringing the number of House members to 600 (though the House should have an odd number, so 601 or 599).
|
What about 1mil each (as I initially intended to write)? That'd be about 301.
I'm happy so long as California has a lot more than anyone else. If you want to put 6,000 in there, go ahead. It's just going to be a bigger mess.