Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
Will, that's not really a valid argument here. Increasing the number by 2 is not much different than not increasing it at all. If the districts were actually limited to 50,000 people each, then the House would be 5,000+ members. Increasing by 2 and increasing by 4,500 are very different things  |
4,500 more members would be a joke. It's already too big. How about we do 100,000 people each, meaning we have 300? Yes, 300 brave warriors determining legislation. THIS IS CONGRESS!