Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jewels
Since she and her family did approve the proofs, I think it's fairly safe to assume that the expression of regret may well have been a marketing ploy that Disney felt necessary, due to the nature of the average American consumer.
Remember, this is a country where breastfeeding women have to fight for the right to breastfeed their babies in public. God forbid their children might see a breast! Look at the hoopla that Janet's breast caused. It logically follows that the exposed back of a child was meant to titillate as well.  |
First, if all you see from the provocative nature is an exposed back, you don't understand how something is provocative to the male mind.
Even a look with the eyes can say 'fuck me' and that entire photo was designed to say 'fuck me'. Call me old fashioned, but a 15 year old in a national publication with a 'come fuck me' photo, might be in poor taste a bit.
But I can't blame Disney if they are upset, she represents millions and millions of dollars to the company who has paid her VERY well, and has already had bad press in relation with their young female stars.
Add to it that the average Hanna Montana fan is most likely 9-12 and its rather apparent why they would be displeased.