Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Way too complex a plan, I enjoy looking for wheels in wheels, plans within plans, but there is a limit.
My guess is they just underestimated Obama.
When this is all said and done I can't see Obama not being the nominee unless, as you said more comes out than him politicing with a crazy minister.
I can't see McCain winning unless the democrats run an utterly inept campaign (again) like they did in 2000 and 2004. If they can't win after a 2 term, leaving on low popularity president with a weak economy, they might as well close shop.
Wake me for 2010, if the democrats get wacky like 92-94 you can expect another 94, and I hope this time the republicans remember why they were elected.
Edit:On a side note I'd vote for Wright before I'd vote for Edwards, how anyone who knows Edwards history as a lawyer can vote for him is beyond me.
|
I think you underestimate the Clintons. We'll see, but I tend to believe that the way Obama dissed Rev. Wright..... ooooo the good Rev. won't take it lying down. It maybe Obama's candidacy.... but it's Wright's 1.whatever million dollar home in the gated white community at stake if he allows Obama to take him and his church down.
And NOONE disses Calypso Louie and walks away unscathed....... no this is just the beginning.
And we have to look at who the winner of a destruction of the frontrunner would be..... hmmmm Clinton? Maybe.
McCain doesn't stand a chance unless Obama is running against him.... Hilary will probably have a landslde vs. McCain.
With Obama it's way too clse and this probably iced it for McCain..... and the DNC is smart enough to see that.
Hilary/Obama vs McCain/Guiliani..... Hilary wins... 44 states .... we shall soon see.