first off i reacted to post 35 and when i was writing my response, i blurred ustwo and ace into each other. sorry ace. my bad.
yours is a more interesting argument, but i don't agree with its premises---dc is already engaged with you about some of the problems, so i'll defer to him.
more generally--and just to say this before i bow out of the thread--the way in which you interpret particular situations is informed entirely by the general approach you adopt--that's what conditions relevance of information and weight amongst relevant information or variables. that's why i posted what i posted in the way i posted it--i'm less interested personally in the analysis of this particular bill than i am in the ways that analysis is arrived at. call it a quirk.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|