Here's some text in small font sooth the large-fontaphobic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
BTW, if Bush and Cheney were to be ousted....Nancy Pelosi is next in line...not Condi 
|
Hence the "smiley" ...
Along with the deep concerns you guys constantly raise with the administration, do you believe the likes of Nancy Pelosi are in not "in" on much of what you and host complain? Who pulls their strings? Who lines their political pockets? They are as "owned" as any politician can be. The leaders of the "peoples mandate" have been rather quiet if not lack-luster since elected, don't some of you feel used? I would be more pissed about those betrayals because they have the power to do something about the claims you're making against Bush & Co. You can argue how power "really" plays out in congress, but they are still not powerless. The evidence that you want to expose or bring to everyone's attention is old news to the powerful on all sides by the time you report it. I'd be seriously questioning their unwillingness to act if things are the way you say they are. To rail on with such a transparent politically-biased unidimensional focus is tedious.
sample predictable opposing group response:
"**** you otto. Don't you know the majority of us TFP'ers (enter something authoritative here)? You obviously have lived under a rock and haven't read (enter obscure liberal author's article, book), or lived in the (oppressed persons classification of the day) shoes. You obviously ignore the facts (paste volume's of questionably sourced articles and quotes tied in with little original opinion here). You're the one that's tedious ... it's that kind of neo-con conservative (enter some bogus pseudo-intellectual dismissive analysis here). Maybe I'll school you in politics someday (add
to mask the put down) ... blah blah blah".