Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JamesB
It -is- lame. And the truth? The truth is that I am -sure- you have NO clue what you are talking about. The first kernel was non-GNU. Hell it took them a year to port the GNU C compiler into Linux.
It was in the early 90s that the term "Linux/GNU/X" was applied to the scope of Linux. Then a few years later it was termed (by some uber nerds) "GNU/Linux".
Hell .. even Linus Torvalds prefers to refer to it as Linux - its that twat Stallman that insists on: "GNU slash Linux". He can kiss my /usr/ass
According to you. I am okay with that - after all, your argument sucks++ 
----
The moral of the story is: call it whatever the hell you want. Just don't expect other people to follow your delusions. |
It doesn't matter that it took them a year to port it. What you say doesn't make sense.
Calling GNU/Linux just Linux while knowing about GNU/Linux is evil.
Do justice to the GNU project!
Promote the values of freedom that GNU stands for!
Inform others that those values of freedom brought the system into existence!
Call it GNU/Linux!