|
No matter what the source, doubt it. Do not take any source as the One And Only.
Wikipedia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Nature, The Lancet, etc, etc, etc... There is no reality from one source. Reality comes from many sources and the 'qualifications' a person may hold really entitle them only to members of a certain school of group-think (generally).
Wikipedia is convenient for many things, but it's pretty easy to spot its flaws and strengths with some other searches - either through google, directory sites (looking for opposing views) or.... or... or... yeah.
Anyway.
Wikipedia is, for the vast majority of its content IMO, very much on the money.
Nothing and no-one is without flaw.
Doubt everything.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
|