Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
Actually I read a lot.
I read this:
What people? And what do you assume has not been accomplished? The point is, "they" have accomplished much.
In three sentences you seemingly don't know who "they are" and then proceed to exclaim "they" have accomplished much. And I'm the one making a "non-point."?
As to you're not defending anyone, sometimes the best defense is offense. You attack rather often.
|
Fair enough, please accept my apology ... I meant for some of my questions to be philosophical questions. The "what people" was asking for a clarification of your question. The "they" I refer to are players on a broader spectrum. My earlier comments to roachboy were:
Quote:
|
That's a reasonable approach ... however, and we've explored this as well, maintaining the status quo in the media (complicit or unaware), global corporatism, and the like. I see lot's of layers managing perceptions and providing/indulging diversions. We can only guess at the end game ... is there an end game?
|
I was in agreement with not liking what Bush and others have done. However, I see cause and effect in these matters with broader diversity.
Regarding attacks, I believe you'll find that I challenge more than attack. If you felt attacked, again, my apologies.