aceventura3

I think the case law on this issue suggests that Presidential records are in-fact public records with the former President given an opportunity to object to private and other records being made public unless compelled to do so by court order.

Personally I think executive privilege is harmed by the law and is a violation of separation of power provision in the Constitution. I know most experts disagree. I think the net affect is Presidential communications with his cabinet and staff are tainted with participants being mindful of potentially everything being said being made public record. I think this hinders frank discussion, and encourages "group think".

__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."