Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Pan.....does all that BS mean you arent planning to answer my questions? Did the judge violate any rights of those persons he tossed out?
Did he question the character of those he tossed out...or disparage them in any manner?
Was there harmful intent in what you describe as an "act of discrimination" towards those persons he tossed out?
Even without knowing intent, were the persons tossed out harmed in any way?
And what law was broken....what legal claims would you have to sue the judge? |
I have answered those a few times.
Did he break a law? I don't know what laws there are for cases like these. But I do believe that it was unethical,
Did he do this with malicious intent? Don't truly know the intent. But the action IMHO was prejudicial, court is not the place, being a judge in court is an abuse of power.
Did he hurt anyone? I don't know an one that was in that court, but personally I would have felt discriminated against. If I had been one that stayed, I would have felt singled out, especially if it were my first time and my crime was a low misdemeanor that I challenged.
We need to ask ourselves, could everyone have benefited from his "lecture"? I would think so.
What grounds do I have to sue? I'd sue on the grounds of discrimination. Would I win? doubtful, but perhaps laws that would make this illegal would be passed.... maybe not.
This goes for ANY group. That is my belief. This is the superficial argument.
What do you think about the underbelly argument? Why do some believe it is ok for one group but not another to do things like this, when it is just as prejudicial as anything? If you are truly fighting racism, how can you support a black judge doing this but not a white judge?
In the end, people can be pro this action for ALL. That's one argument.... I am against the action period. But I can see both sides.
But when people say one group can and one can't and give some bullshit excuse..... then I can't see anything there but a prejudiced wolf in sheep's clothing. That person may truly believe it is ok..... but to me it's the worst form of prejudice.
There I answered your questions.... even tho, I have been saying the same basic things for the past 5 pages..... but that's ok.
BTW you didn't read any of the post above you did you.... because looking this one over and comparing my post above you...... they are almost identical.