|
In terms of the legality of it - as far as I am aware a judge can do what he wants (within reason) in his or her courtroom, and can certainly ask certain individuals to approach the bench or have a private discussion.
I suppose it is fashionable for white people to claim nowadays that they are the victims of reverse racism. It must be a way of trying to wash away historical guilt.
Of course, I dont mean to be anti-American, the British profited awfully from the rape of Africa as well, and many of the worst villians of America were British colonialists.
There is a big point and a little point.
The little point is that the actions of the judge are probably inappropriate, certainly make him look a bit silly and are certainly not criminal.
The big point is that, quite simply the actions of white people and black people, in regards to race, DO have different meanings. I think that for someone to argue this was not the case, would be very difficult to connect to logic.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."
The Gospel of Thomas
|