View Single Post
Old 03-31-2008, 12:43 PM   #45 (permalink)
MuadDib
Psycho
 
MuadDib's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
Really? You think the path to the nomination for either candidate depends on getting the delegates out of the states in question? If you give 85% of each states delegates to Hillary it doesn't get her there. She'd still need to win a high % of the states left. Obama need less but same thing basically, just lower numbers needed by him.

IMO, the road to the nomination at this point goes through the SD's. that's all part of the Dems setting up a completely stupid system to pick a nominee, again IMHO.
There's a subtle difference between what I think and what you are saying; that being that I think the path to winning the primary (getting 2,024 delegates) is locked in seating the states in question in some manner. There are other options for getting the nomination such as changing the rules to lower that number or a Gore, Edwards, or other non-candidate, compromise. However, I think those options are even less appealing to most Americans than a super delegate lovefest. Either way, I do believe that it is the cleanest and most politically intelligent way for the party to proceed, they just need to do there best to not seem too stupid while doing it.

As for the super delegate thing, I honestly have no problem with the system as a whole. I think it is important for party insiders to be able to maintain some checks against rampant popular control. Party politics is very interesting because a party has a sort of culture of it's own that's tied in with ideology and while you want to test your candidates against popular opinion, and maybe even see how they hold up to a good public roasting, it ultimately isn't the general election and the party is a quasi-private organization with the right define its own course. I agree that a situation, such as this, where it might plausibly come down to a super delegate situation, is not something that I think is desirable for the party or the public. I suppose though that if the good reason for keeping them around is as a final check (or last resort) towards maintaining party control within the party then maybe this is exactly how it's supposed to work and it's just unfortunate that it had to come to this... again for which I blame the party for the delegate stripping debacle.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
MuadDib is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360