Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
If you review my earlier post, I believe I already addressed what I believe should happen to the defendents. In my original post that you quoted (about Libby's pardon), I simply mentioned an example of where leniency may have been better served regarding individuals like the border agents instead of Libby. It will play out one way or another. If they are convicted in retrial, then lock 'em up.
I thought you would have been happy regarding my views on Scooter's conviction.
BTW - why haven't you voted?
|
Why won't you share the sources that have influenced your support for a new trial for Compean and Ramos? When I post any opinion....this is a politics thread.... I strive to share the information that shapes my opinion. In sharing the information that shapes my opinion, not only my opinion is open to challenge, but the strength and accuracy of the influences on my opinion are open to challenge.
It's a transparent process. Rejecting the jury verdict and the sentence is a bold move.....there should be compelling reasons for adopting such a contrary stance. What have you got?
I am not voting....yet, because I have no dog in this fight. A lot of people are questioning the verdict and sentence in this case. I want to be shown what the influences were that convinced them to do so.
I don't see any concrete influences so far.....but a lot of people have been persuaded....so lets see some posts that point the rest of us to the sources of the "persuasion".....or is this a "feelings" based reaction to the verdict and the sentences?