Is this question motivated by the influence of the impression that Obama was weakened by the Jermiah Wright "controversy" and thus is a potentially weaker candidate in a run against McCain, than Clinton would be?
No matter, it seems like the wrong day for this question:
Quote:
http://www.elpasotimes.com/ci_874518...e=most_emailed
After every protest was answered and every objection rejected, a hectic and sometimes heated El Paso County Democratic Party convention ended 12 hours after it started with support for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton increasing in El Paso to more than 94 percent.
Of the 127 state convention delegates elected by those attending the convention Saturday at the Don Haskins Center, 120 Clinton delegates were elected and only seven Sen. Barack Obama delegates were elected.
Those 127 delegates, along with an additional 50 or so delegates seated by a committee, will go to Austin in June to represent El Paso at the state Democratic convention......
|
Let us wait until after the Pennsylvania prmary results are in, to discuss this question seriously.....
....there is no risk of strengthening McCain's support by prolonging the competition between Clinton and Obama. McCain offers more years of Bush's policies....there will be time enough to build oppostion to that easy target, a week or less before the election would be sufficient.....after this is settled, no matter how much longer it takes.