View Single Post
Old 03-26-2008, 09:58 PM   #165 (permalink)
filtherton
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnifeMissile
I don't understand this kind of reasoning. Almost by definition, if something has some "impact," it can be measured. So, how can anyone suggest such a thing?
I think the idea is that science is limited, and that humanity's ability to understand the universe is limited. Is there a phenomena that science can't observe? How could you tell?


Quote:
I don't think your analogies are apt.

We agree that trying to explain science with religion is stupid. However, that religion exists is a reality and science is the study of reality. So, why couldn't science examine religion? You don't think sociology and neurology are sciences? What are you saying, specifically?
I think he's saying that the methods by which scientists go about explaining reality don't jibe well with the methods that religious folk use to explain reality, and also perhaps that it is useless to attempt to use science to try to explain things which are by definition not verifiable by scientific means. I think he's saying that folks who try to explain away theism with science miss the point of theism.

Quote:
If it were just press, then there would be far fewer concerned atheists. It's the incessant subversion of science by fundamentalists that has caused a backlash from nonbelievers to quell religion. If religion has caused you lot to go mad and rebuke science, something that has allowed my life to be as enjoyable as it is, then your religion has got to go!
It is silly to lash out against all religion when your problems lie with a subset of religious folk. I cringe when some of my fellow atheists, the ones who would call themselves guardians of reason, can't be bothered to see the forest because of the trees that are in the way. The fact that certain fundamentalists feel threatened by science says nothing about religion in general. If one were so inclined as to take a casual survey of the facts, one might see that there are plenty of religious folk who also balk at the subversion of science, as well as plenty of people who, for completely secular reasons, would subvert science and reason as a convenient means to an end.
filtherton is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360