Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Rick Rolled to child porn = you're a pedophile, says FBI

Kahn · 03-26-2008, 12:40 PM

Not that I agree or disagree entirely with anyone on this particular topic with any certainty beyond pure speculation and intuitive gut feeling, I can't help but agree with Ustwo on the BELIEF that Vosburgh is indeed guilty of SOMETHING based solely on his behaviour when being accosted in the first place. Guilty of what exactly, the evidence has not proven.

Consider the very fact that he was attempting to destroy his hardware when the authorities came for him, this is most certainly the characteristic behaviour of someone trying to hide SOMETHING. Whether it was child pornography or intricately laid out plans to rob a bank, we may never know. The fact remains that if he were indeed innocent, he most certainly would not have been trying to destroy the "evidence", however assumed his guilt may have been by the authorities at the time.

Further, it doesn't help his case any that A) he was indeed known to have accessed a link that, to my basic understanding, was posted in an area known to be frequented by known offenders and in such a way that he knew what he was clicking on .. and B) attempted to obstruct justice when confronted with the accusation.

From a purely deductive standpoint, it smells like guilt to me.

03-26-2008, 12:40 PM	#12 (permalink)
Kahn Psycho Location: Physically in Houston, TX - Mentally Lost in Time	Not that I agree or disagree entirely with anyone on this particular topic with any certainty beyond pure speculation and intuitive gut feeling, I can't help but agree with Ustwo on the BELIEF that Vosburgh is indeed guilty of SOMETHING based solely on his behaviour when being accosted in the first place. Guilty of what exactly, the evidence has not proven. Consider the very fact that he was attempting to destroy his hardware when the authorities came for him, this is most certainly the characteristic behaviour of someone trying to hide SOMETHING. Whether it was child pornography or intricately laid out plans to rob a bank, we may never know. The fact remains that if he were indeed innocent, he most certainly would not have been trying to destroy the "evidence", however assumed his guilt may have been by the authorities at the time. Further, it doesn't help his case any that A) he was indeed known to have accessed a link that, to my basic understanding, was posted in an area known to be frequented by known offenders and in such a way that he knew what he was clicking on .. and B) attempted to obstruct justice when confronted with the accusation. From a purely deductive standpoint, it smells like guilt to me. __________________ Attention everyone: We have another potential asshole in the area ! You don't have bad luck, the reason bad things happen to you is because you're a dumbass !! Dinner $50 Drinks $30 Motel $40 Finding out she swallows - PRICELESS!!!