Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Backdooring?
|
yes, backdooring. Meaning that you can't make the changes you want according to the legally prescribed methods in the constitution, so you ignore them and appoint a group of people to power that will.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
And you've still not addressed the fact that SLAVERY was in the original CONSTITUTION. That "right" had to be taken away by the backdooring of the Constitution by Abraham Lincoln. A PATRIOT.
|
You cannot show a constitutional right to slavery because it did not exist. The reason slavery was possible was because slaves were considered PROPERTY. how many times must you read that to understand it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
That's how IT starts! When some people hate freedom and our peaceful way of life and decide that it's time to take an antiquated Amendment way out of context and say 'fuck peace and happiness and the AMERICAN DREAM' because they want to have a gun, they are manipulating the Constitution in order to have a gun and put people in danger.
|
'the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed' seems to be a damn fine indicator that there is actually a constitutional right to keep and bear arms, so how is that 'out of context'?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
So you think it's okay to bathe the Bill of Right in the blood of all of the innocent people that have died to to firearms? Doesn't that give you PAUSE?
|
strawman and irrelevant to the question asked.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
So in essence what you're saying is that you KNOW that CRIMINALS should be allowed to have guns so that they can commit CRIMES against EVERYBODY?
|
non-sensical.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Can we stop with this exaggerated and nonsensical way of posting? It's not getting anyone anywhere, and it damages the discussion. Using buzz phrases intended to evoke an emotional response (such as "destroy the constitution") that really have nothing to do with anything, while kinda funny, doesn't belong in respectful discourse.
|
well will, when you advocate ignoring the supreme law of the land and the law on how to amend it, you're advocating the destruction of the constitution....excuse me, just the parts you don't like.