Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
I don't trust names. I trust factual, verifiable evidence. I hope no one just automatically trusts what I say or post; always fact check because no one is right 100% of the time.
|
Of course. With the high-speed course society advances at, one can no longer validate ALL new information that is presented. How easy for me would it be to validate the existence of a quark, or prove mass can collapse beyond nuclei to form singularities, or find a raging psychopath and ask if he was touched improperly as a child... it isn't. However, enough scientists with respectable titles have proven it and then a bunch of other less known guys have validated it separately in hopes to disprove them.
As to what goes on here, again, there has to be enough evidence for me to believe, and even then I may just consider the "evidence" presented as nothing more than an amount of opinions.