Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
The war on murder costs millions and millions every year and yet people are still murdering, its obviously not working and insane to continue to spend money on the issue.
An absurd example but the logic is the same. The issue should not be how much, or how many, but what would be the cost of changing to society. I do not have a good answer for that, and neither does anyone. Perhaps it would be best if they were legal, I don't know for sure, but I do know that expense of enforcement alone isn't the only way to look at it.
|
We're right it is an absurd example. Unless you think drug abuse and murder should be dealt with by similar methods?
If not I fail to see how the "logic is the same."
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Still doesn't explain why you included that in your first post. Its not relevant to the conversation.
|
My first post? Are you getting threads confussed or simply not reading the same thread as I am?
At any rate- you stated "I'd be for 100% drug legalization but only in a libertarian government." And now you wonder why I addressed it in my post?