View Single Post
Old 03-13-2008, 12:58 PM   #29 (permalink)
robot_parade
Junkie
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandy
I have been reading and re-reading this thread trying to come up with a suitable answer...

I am a journalist. And I feel that if a presidential candidate offered a group of the media an all expenses paid week to some exotic resort of whatever, I will have no problem accepting. There's no interviews, no political content whatsoever. Nothing is on the record.

Now personally, i dont see the problem with that. Where the problem does come in, is when it affects your judgement, when it affects your ability to be the watchdog of the govenment (cos thats what journalists are), when it clouds your head with "ooh he gave me a free week at an exotic resort so let me give him a bit of good publicity in the paper" BULL SHIT!!!

Now, some people might see that as being two faced...and thats fine.

But as long as my two faced behavior does not comprimise my beliefs, morals, values and journalistic integrity to report in an honest and fair manner, to be the watchdog for the government, and not be biased, and not pass judgement, and just disregard everything i was taught on how to be a journalist, then free weekend with no strings attached, here I come!
Well, I have two responses to that, which are pretty much my responses to The_Jazz above...

o It's human nature to be grateful when someone does something nice for you, and thus to have a more favorable outlook on them - AKA a bias towards them. That bias may not show up as a tit-for-tat transaction, but a kinder tone in your reporting of that candidate, or casting his actions in a more positive light, etc.

o Even if you are capable of not being biased towards someone who as done something nice to you, doesn't the appearance of impropriety bother you?

I don't mean this personally, but I wouldn't ever trust a reporter who accepted such an offer to report in an unbiased manner on the candidate in question - and would question their judgment on other reporting as well. Just as I wouldn't trust a politician who let the entertainment industry pay for a vacation to a 5-star resort to regulate the same entertainment industry. Even if he/she is one of those magical people who isn't biased towards people who have done nice things for him or her, the appearance of bias is enough for me.
robot_parade is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360