Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
He's under no LEGAL obligation, but if he want's people to be able to understand his points so they can agree or disagree he sure as hell is. And yes, when you stand shoulder to shoulder with organizations like the Minutemen, you're going to be called a racist unless you provide reasoning separate from theirs.
|
So what I read this to say is that unless he provides more motive for using the term "illegal" than than it is just against the law, he is at fault for people considering him racist. Is that true?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
So it's okay for you to strawman and completely miss me posting this:
|
I did not miss this. You have made it very clear that you personally do not believe him racist while still defending those who may find him so.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
No, what I'm saying is that they do. It's a reality. I'm not excusing it, but there you have it. For example: don't drink the water in Mexico. I'm not excusing their lack of water treatment infrastructure, but it's simply a reality.
|
By the mere fact that you have told Pan he is inviting it by not explaining his motivation you are defending those who call him racist. Your argument seems to be that by doing nothing to head off a assumptive accusation before it is made he is to blame for it. That is like blaming the woman who choses to wear a short skirt and low cut top for getting raped.
Unless I misunderstand what you are saying.