Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
While generally I'm against what I see as the overuse of medications for mental instability, I do think there are exceptions.
Get help, you have a problem.
|
I'm not the one who has consistently supported what is documented here:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...9&postcount=15
Or the destruction of a sovereign foreign nation, hundreds of thousands of it's inhabitants dead, and nearly 4000 of out own soldiers dead, justified by what will be described in this coming report, quashed for four long years:
Quote:
http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Nat...-briefs-031008
New Mexican wire services |
3/9/2008 -
Report vets prewar White House claims
WASHINGTON — After an acrimonious investigation that spanned four years, the Senate Intelligence Committee is preparing to release a detailed critique of the Bush administration's claims in the build-up to war with Iraq, congressional officials said.
The long-delayed document catalogs dozens of prewar assertions by President Bush and other administration officials that proved to be wildly inaccurate about Iraq's alleged stockpiles of banned weapons and pursuit of nuclear arms.
But officials said the report reaches a mixed verdict on the key question of whether the White House misused intelligence to make the case for war.
The document criticizes White House officials for making assertions that failed to reflect disagreements or uncertainties in the underlying intelligence on Iraq, officials said. But the report acknowledges that many claims were consistent with intelligence assessments in circulation at the time.....
|
...and no, Robb-Silberman was a "white wash" that was ordered by the president to avoid examining what he knew, vs. what he said to justify ordering the invasion of Iraq:
Quote:
http://www.wmd.gov/report/report.html
http://www.wmd.gov/commissioners.html
.....Finally, we emphasize two points about the scope of this Commission's charter, particularly with respect to the Iraq question. First, we were not asked to determine whether Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. That was the mandate of the Iraq Survey Group; our mission is to investigate the reasons why the Intelligence Community's pre-war assessments were so different from what the Iraq Survey Group found after the war. <h3>Second, we were not authorized to investigate how policymakers used the intelligence assessments they received from the Intelligence Community. Accordingly, while we interviewed a host of current and former policymakers during the course of our investigation, the purpose of those interviews was to learn about how the Intelligence Community reached and communicated its judgments about Iraq's weapons programs--not to review how policymakers subsequently used that information.</h3>
LOOKING BACK:
CASE STUDIES IN FAILURE AND SUCCESS
|