Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I am amused by those on the right who try to compare what Bush and Chaney HAVE done with what they think Clinton MIGHT do....a common deflection tactic among many conservative talking heads like Carlson (and apparently among some TFP contributors as well)
|
I generally don't deflect points. I know what Bush and Chaney are capable of and I know (based on what has been made public) what they have done or authorized. I generally support their actions, I have said so many times, and I have stated that in many of those situations I would have made the same decisions they made. Chaney in particular is a mean son of a bitch, who you don't want to piss off unless you are ready for a fight (a real fight, a real fight that may involve some mean - really mean stuff).
Hillery Clinton in my view is very similar to Dick Chaney. Like I wrote in the past, Hilery Clinton is the type of woman who would grab a man by his balls and squeeze until he starts singing like a 13 year-old in the Vienna Boys choir. Just the sound of her voice makes me shudder. I just wish she was on my
side.
{added} Regarding Carlson, conservative or not, why didn't the reporter follow up with a question about what was meant by the term "monster" by the person who used it? did the reporter instinctively know what was being said and implicitly agree?