Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Second, in counterbalance, an individual's needs would be limited and sensible, because society would develop, through education and by example, "a new-type socialist person." Reoriented individuals would desire only what was truly necessary to sustain life, eschewing ostentation and waste. They would also contribute to the socialist society altruistically, applying their work and varied talents to the common welfare. With the superabundance of goods and the new socialist individual, society could then be organized on the principle: "from each according to his ability; to each according to his needs." Thus, communism would mark an end to coercion, want, and inequality.
|
This is the part of communism that dooms it to failure. Even those leaders of the world's greatest communist powers refuse to give up their lives of luxury and privilege to be just another "worker" in cause of the greater good. You sure did not see Mao or Lenin or Castro living in simple state supplied apartments or standing in line at state stores with the common populace.
__________________
SQL query
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
Zero rows returned....
Last edited by SirSeymour; 03-07-2008 at 12:29 PM..
|