Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Is there any limit to pacifism or my pacifism? My pacifism probably does have an eventual limit, but that's not really relevant. What does seem relevant is that you seem to be okay with an additional 100,000,000 deaths so long as they're following your philosophy. Can you think about that for just a minute? You've essentially said, "More can die, but it's okay so long as everyone agrees with me."
Besides, I've already explained how an "armed" populace doesn't mean shit. You having a glock isn't going to stop 'them'. You following my hypothetical advice and carrying out covert bombing missions would really be the only way to protect yourself from an invading or domestic force that seeks to hurt or kill you. All you need are things such as silly putty, candle wax, corn starch, and yarn (I won't post the full list online, if I can even remember it).
Have you ever fired on SWAT members? Military officers?
|
you're right will. we peon civilians are probably too weak. can't stand up to anything. Thats why we NEED the government to protect us. to hell with freedom if we are too scared of terrorists or anything like that. it's not like if people ever pulled their collective heads out of their asses, they could figure out that 15 million will beat 4 million any day of the week. but god no, we can't have that because that would be way too many more dead. it's better just to live as servants to the government instead of all the death and destruction that having everyone armed would do. 
I'm with you buddy. I'd rather have the government tell me what i'm allowed to do instead of think for myself. where do i turn my guns in?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|