Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
but what pisses me off will is that i see your arguments stating that you'd rather have 200 million dead by nobody resisting than to have 300 million dead by people defending themselves. is there any limit to pacifism? or is life really not that important to you?
|
Is there any limit to pacifism or my pacifism? My pacifism probably does have an eventual limit, but that's not really relevant. What does seem relevant is that you seem to be okay with an additional 100,000,000 deaths so long as they're following your philosophy. Can you think about that for just a minute? You've essentially said, "More can die, but it's okay so long as everyone agrees with me."
Besides, I've already explained how an "armed" populace doesn't mean shit. You having a glock isn't going to stop 'them'. You following my hypothetical advice and carrying out covert bombing missions would really be the only way to protect yourself from an invading or domestic force that seeks to hurt or kill you. All you need are things such as silly putty, candle wax, corn starch, and yarn (I won't post the full list online, if I can even remember it).
Have you ever fired on SWAT members? Military officers?