Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
And there's quite simply no way to be sure that it couldn't have been 300 million had the population been armed. You can guess, with bias, but you'd be kidding yourself if you really thought that you knew beyond a reasonable doubt. That's really where this topic always gets unhinged.
You lay out scenarios, and I lay out scenarios. You lay out stats and I lay out stats. You get pissed and I get pissed. You link articles and I link articles. Blah blah blah blah.  |
but what pisses me off will is that i see your arguments stating that you'd rather have 200 million dead by nobody resisting than to have 300 million dead by people defending themselves. is there any limit to pacifism? or is life really not that important to you?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|