Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rekna
I fail to see what in that churches vision is divisive. Do you really think that pledging commitment to Africa and pledging commitment to the USA are mutually exclusive?
|
When it singles out one Continent and peoples, yes. If that vision were to say "a non-negotiable commitment to ALL people" I wouldn't have a complaint and I would be very much in support.
The fact that the leader of the "church" went to Libya with Louis Farrakhan during a period when Libya was a terrorist state hating the US, the fact the church gave a racist Louis Farrakhan an award that said he "truly epitomized greatness", the fact that the more information you dig up on Rev. Wright and this "church", the more you find it keeps racism alive and well... yes, it is very divisive, yes it is very racist, yes it is Christian in name only... yes it is Obama's church and I, for one will not support any man that supports such racism.
But again, if it were a "church" that had the vision of empowering whites, non-negotiable commitments to Europe, and so on and the candidate was white he'd be run out as the country's biggest racist, yet when it is Obama and the "church" separates races and promotes black agendas... It's ok, there's nothing wrong with that.
RACISM = RACISM REGARDLESS OF WHICH COLOR USES IT.
Sorry, Obama just isn't my man and this is a major reason, but not the only reason, nor the deciding factor, but it is something people should look at, investigate for themselves, and think about.