My understanding is there are a few more american forces (from 2006-present) than 8000. In and around 28000-30000, with roughly half being part of the NATO security force and half being under no jurisdiction. The % killed per capita since 2006 is very much skewed onto Canada.
And that is exactly the problem, as Martian pointed out. US forces are there in 10x the number with 100x the budget, and since 2006 the brunt of the resistance has been met by British and Canadian forces. Where the Americans were and are under no illusions of the intent of the mission, the NATO forces are there under the context of a security force, not an active combat force. I also agree that more forces in the south, in combat roles, are required from other countries.
I like the compromise that has been found between the liberals and conservatives. The firm stance of "must pull out in early '09" was contrary to NATO and Canadian intent.
|