Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I agree in theory and there are probably many examples of mistakes in the 200+ year history of the Court (Dred Scott for one), but until such mistakes are overturned by a future Court, they are constitutional....regardless of the interpretation of a FOX TV analyst.
|
If I understand you correctly, you're saying that as the 'ultimate interpreters' of the constitution, if the USSC ruled that the 13th and 14th amendment no longer applies to black people because (insert lame random reason here) then that would be constitutional?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|