Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I dont know much about him, but I would agree with his interpretation of the Constitution and individual rights....although I dont believe all "rights" are God-given as he has stated and written.
Where I have an absolute disagreement with him is in his assertion that some decisions of the USSC have been unconstitutional (I dont know which ones)....which is absurd because the Supreme Court is the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution, and unless it rules that something is unconstitutional, it isnt.
I have little patience for judges or anyone who suggests that their personal interpretation of the Constitution is the only "true and correct" interpretation.
|
That's sound a little like Nixon's augment that if the POTUS does then it's not illegal. Kind of but not quite. I do think their are times that the USSC could have and might in the future making ruling that violate the Constitution. The USSC is comprised of people. People are fallible , they make mistakes.