View Single Post
Old 02-11-2008, 03:11 PM   #55 (permalink)
Martian
Young Crumudgeon
 
Martian's Avatar
 
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
I believe I said, and I quote, "These 'protests', as you want to call them, are nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to attack a set of religious beliefs and only reinforces the notion that Anon is attacking Scientology because, well, it's Scientology." You then proceeded to validate what I typed out.

The problem isn't so much what's being done, but who's doing it. Seeing as how most of society currently views Scientologists as crazy and most religions consider Scientology a dangerous cult, any reason to attack Scientology is A-Okay (Apparently). The fact is that you don't define what a religion is or what it constitutes. Because it's practices do not conform to whatever definition you want to place doesn't mean it needs to change. Still, it amazes me just how many atheists suddenly care about the way the CoS chooses to run it's religion. It perplexes me.

(Oh, and TFP really needs sarcasm tags as that doesn't go over well on the internet.)
I think you're missing the distinction between Scientology itself and the Church of Scientology. Read up on Free Zone Scientology and this may become slightly more clear.

Nobody takes issue with the beliefs of Scientology as a religion. The Free Zone guys are free to believe in it if they want; I think it's silly to say the least, but if that's your bag then by all means. The Church, on the other hand, routinely engages in practices that are, eh.. somewhat shady, we'll say. The highly touted examples are Operation Snow White and Operation Freak Out, but it goes way beyond that. People who get labeled SP are regarded by the Church and it's members as sub-human. Homes get picketed, employers get called and fed false information. Lies are spread. CoS attempts to strong-arm anyone who calls their practices into question.

Frankly, I wouldn't have a problem with the Church taking people's money if that's all they did. You think the path to enlightenment costs $400 000 and can be given to you by a guy who wrote crappy science fiction, then go ahead and spend your cash. I'll keep mine, thanks. What bothers me is how much the Church works against people who say anything negative about them, how they engage in shady or outright illegal practices in an attempt to intimidate people who don't agree with them and how they get away with it so often. It has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with an organization that bullies, slanders and extorts anyone who they deem to be against them. If Microsoft handed out libelous leaflets condemning Linus Torvalds, everyone would be up in arms; but because the Church of Scientology hides behind the religious excuse they can get a free pass and often avoid close scrutiny. Or at least they could in the past. With the internet being so widespread now information like that becomes exceedingly difficult to suppress and now people are learning exactly what CoS is up to. And a lot of people are very, very angry.

The concept of paying for enlightenment isn't new. Tithing still exists in some Christian sects today, although I don't think any of them enforce as strictly as they used to. A collection plate (a feature of every Christian sect, from what I've seen) is a form of paying for enlightenment. This is not the issue.

All joking aside, even doing this, speaking out against CoS on a public forum, carries a risk with it (albeit a small one). The people holding these protests aren't wearing masks because they look cool. It's because attending one of these rallies carries a very real risk of being identified, labeled SP and subsequently harassed by the Church of Scientology. Those Free Zone Scientologists I mentioned above? They get the same treatment, because the Church of Scientology wants the general population to see them as synonymous with belief in Scientology. That's important for them, so that they can continue to make claims of religious suppression.

To use your example above, should we ignore the guy who engages in petty theft just because some people commit grand theft auto? Anon goes after the target they have the ability to affect.
__________________
I wake up in the morning more tired than before I slept
I get through cryin' and I'm sadder than before I wept
I get through thinkin' now, and the thoughts have left my head
I get through speakin' and I can't remember, not a word that I said

- Ben Harper, Show Me A Little Shame
Martian is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360